Georgia State University Library
Ask a Librarian
Site Map |  Site Index |  Site Search
Home > About the Library > Usability > University Library Usability Activities Summary: 2003-2006

University Library Usability Activities Summary: 2003-2006

The library began usability activities in late 2003. We began by inviting students and faculty to participate in a focus group to re-design the home page. Our activities have primarily been focused on the library's home page, access to resources from the home page, and one study focusing on our Research Guides.

2003 Focus Group View Full Report

Background

Twenty-two library web site users met with us to review four prototypes for a new home page and to find out what they felt were the strengths weaknesses of the site. We wanted to know what features and functions had to be preserved in our redesing, and what aspects could be altered and what things were inconsequential.

Findings

Study Questions


2004 Home Page Prototype Studies (Round 1  Round 2)

Background

Twenty-five students participated in two rounds of testing of our prototype study of the new home page. We built the prototypes from the suggestions and preferences provided by students and faculty in our 2003 focus group study. The conclusions drawn from analysis of the usability test results support the following:

Findings

The users had no problem identifying the preferred homepage links for the following information:

The users had no problem performing the following online tasks:

The most serious Identification problem for navigation terms occurred with Finding the Biology Reference Librarian’s office hours

The other identification problems may stem from users being unfamiliar with the library services. This may be countered by a help section or online tutorial.

The most serious task performance issues occurred with Finding the Psychology Reference Librarian’s name and e-mail address.

The other task performance problems may stem from the third party applications with the GSU Library website. The ones featured in this study to perform database searching and course reserves access are beyond the direct control of Georgia State University.

Study Questions

ROUND TWO

Changes made to the prototype for Round 2 testing included:

Findings

The most serious task performance issues occurred with the following:

Study Questions & Tasks

 

Action Items

After the second round we were satisfied that our re-design was acceptable for public launch. We provided a link to the old home page during the following semester as a transitional option for users. Anecdotal evidence suggests that our design is of interest to other libraries and a few students have offered comments in support of the design. However, there is no quantitative or qualitative evidence that our design has improved efficency, effectiveness in student learning.


2004 Research Guides (View Full Report)

Background

Our first foray into studies beyond the home page was with our Research Guides which are developed by our subject liaions librarians. We had recently implemented a content management system to aid the development and maintenance of our guides and wanted to test the interface and menuing with students. The study involved 9 students who were asked task based questions while viewing the research guide.

Findings

Study Questions & Tasks

Action Items

During the process of prototyping it became evident that there are essentially 2 approaches to redesigning the research guides. Further discussion and analysis of this study is recommended for the creation of action items.

Incremental Approach
This approach assumes that one site with some modifications can serve two sets of patrons – Students and Librarians.

  • Create prototypes using the results of the study
  • Study the usability of the prototypes
  • Implement the results

Start from the basics approach.
This approach stems from the belief that the students are the primary patrons of the research guides. Therefore the research guides need to be designed with the students in mind. Currently it is unclear as to who the primary patrons are since the research guides contain information not valuable to the students yet is extremely valuable to the other patrons namely the librarians. Librarians use the research guides for 2 additional purposes:

  • Share content with other librarians
  • Virtual Storage area: Use the research guides to store information that may be needed for classes.

The approach will result in 2 (virtual) sites, one catering to the students and another catering to the librarians. The student site will be a new design based on the needs of the students. The other site will be the existing site or a new site based on the needs of the librarian.



2005 Home Page Button Report (View Full Report)

The study involved testing user preferences and choices with the addition of one home page icon button and an alternative label for the icon used for the List of Databases. The Liaison Department requested an icon button for the Research Guides and provided their goals, purpose, and preferred labels for the UWG to test. The Electronic Resources Librarian provided alternate labels for the List of Databases icon and goals as well.

The Usability Working Group undertook a paper prototype study of 90 students during October 2005. There were 3 versions of the home page to test (the existing page and two prototypes with new icons/labels) and we tested 30 students on each version asking them 3 questions. An additional 30 students were testing using a laptop to see if the paper study skewed the results. The current home page design and two prototypes were developed for the test.

Findings

Participants are equally as likely to choose text links on the left side of the screen as icons in both paper and laptop-based prototypes.

Study Questions & Tasks

Action Items

 

2006 and Beyond

Usability activites that are being planned include a study for the re-design of our Interlibrary Loan page and the menu/page that displays when a user clicks on the home page icon labeled "Start Your Research". We also have a study involving Instant Messaging in the works.

 

Author: Doug Goans, Web Development Librarian


Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version +